Does your portfolio support your retirement income needs?

Does your portfolio support your retirement income needs?

As retirement approaches, one of the biggest concerns for many people is generating income to cover living expenses. For those who have invested in growth and income stocks, it can be tempting to rely on the income generated by these stocks to meet their financial needs. However, as with any investment, there is always a degree of risk involved. If the stock market experiences a downturn, the income generated by these stocks may not be enough to cover living expenses. In this situation, retirees may be forced to sell equity positions in order to generate the income they need. This can be a risky strategy, as it can erode the principal value of their portfolio and leave them with less money to fund their retirement.

One alternative strategy that retirees may consider is moving some of their investments from growth and income stocks into a real estate investment trust (REIT). REITs are companies that own or finance income-producing real estate properties. They offer investors a way to invest in real estate without the hassle of owning and managing physical properties. Instead, investors purchase shares in a REIT, which represents a portion of the ownership in the underlying real estate assets.

There are several reasons why investing in a REIT can be a good strategy for retirees. First, REITs typically offer higher dividend yields than growth and income stocks. This means that retirees can generate a higher level of income from their investments without having to sell equity positions. In addition, REIT dividends are often more stable and predictable than the dividends paid by growth and income stocks. This can be particularly important for retirees who rely on a consistent stream of income to cover their living expenses.

Another advantage of investing in a REIT is that it can provide diversification benefits. Real estate is a different asset class than stocks, and it can provide a source of returns that is not correlated with the stock market. By investing in a REIT, retirees can reduce their exposure to stock market volatility and potentially reduce their overall portfolio risk.

Finally, investing in a REIT can provide retirees with exposure to the potential benefits of real estate ownership without the headaches of being a landlord. REITs are managed by professional management teams who are responsible for the day-to-day operations of the properties. This means that investors can benefit from the potential appreciation of real estate without having to worry about managing tenants, repairs, and maintenance.

Investing in a REIT can be a good strategy for retirees who are looking for a stable source of income and diversification benefits. By moving some of their investments from growth and income stocks into a REIT, retirees can generate higher levels of income without having to sell equity positions. In addition, they can benefit from the stable and predictable dividends offered by REITs and the potential diversification benefits of investing in real estate. Overall, a REIT can be a valuable addition to a retiree’s investment portfolio.

Whether or not you support gun control, do not increase funding for the ATF; here’s why.

Whether or not you support gun control, do not increase funding for the ATF; here’s why.

I saw this article today that the current administration is seeking to make a radical increase in funding for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (“ATF”).  This is a tragic mistake.

I led a proposal effort to win an important software development contract (over $100M) with this agency several years ago.  When we won, I spoke with the outgoing contractor who shared with me, “You have no idea what you’re getting yourself into.”

In fact, we were the fifth consecutive contractor who got sideways with this agency during execution of the contract, where we were developing new software systems for their agents to manage cases, access investigatory information, and track firearms used during the commission of crimes.

I found the technical leadership at ATF to be the most incompetent, dishonest, and technically inept organization I worked with in over a decade providing critical consulting services with the federal government.

Any additional funding to this organization should be equated to setting hard-earned taxpayer dollars on fire.

Over a year of deceit, and bringing the full force of the Department of Justice legal minds to accuse my firm of failing to deliver on our promises, eventually resulted in an embarrassing settlement (the non-disclosure terms of which I do not remember so I will not provide details). This agreement protected their incompetence from becoming known but deprived their agents of an upgrade to key systems (the fifth failure in a row from as many contractors) sorely needed by their field agents.

The level of their incompetence was staggering.  The lack of principled leadership: embarrassing. The pettiness of their retaliatory efforts: mind boggling. And the corruption of their acquisitions team: disgusting.

The experience eventually drove me out of doing business with the federal government, becoming disillusioned that we could ever provide meaningful technology for the field agents who often put their lives at risk to perform dangerous and complex missions. I urge Congress to reject any material increase in funding to this agency until an independent investigation into the millions spent developing information technology systems there can be radically transformed.  

Without that, you’re just burning more taxpayer funds.